Pajama Jeans are the New Jeggings

The days of pants, mom jeans and jeggings are over. That’s right, thanks to the think-tanks at Pajama Jeans, you no longer have to worry about squeezing into “regular” pants or fussing with the ankles of your Cheap Mondays – the worlds of pajamas and jeans have finally collided, and the please of women who’ve previously rotated between Yoga pants and oversize flannel bottoms have finally been answered.

No, it’s not an SNL skit. Pajama Jeans are the real deal, offering “mock jean” qualities (like jeggings with painted-on zippers and pockets) with the stretchiness of well, dorm wear, thus fitting the bill for the type of fashion we hoped (and didn’t think) could possibly exist.

Claiming to be “stylish”, “sexy”, “soft” and/or “comfortable”, Pajama Jeans come in eight available sizes and boast the classic bootleg cut, and as depicted in their infomercial, you can wear them out with friends, while riding a bicycle, on a plane or on a train (and perhaps even with Sam-I-Am).

Offering $10 off (once you try to leave the site), the denim Snuggie equivalent runs for $39.95 and comes with a free grey crew-neck t-shirt to complete the casual “dress down Friday” look. But the real question of the hour remains: how long before we all start buying them and defending them as boldly as we did jeggings?

Sympatico Image

s-_pajama_jeans_150_x_150.jpg

Tags: Cheap Mondays, jeggings, mom jeans, Pajama Jeans, pajama pants, Snuggies

Related Posts

Previous Post Next Post

Comments

  1. Avatar
    • Anonymous
    • January 1, 1970
    Reply
    there ugly…
  2. Avatar
    • Anonymous
    • January 1, 1970
    Reply
    isn’t this usually the way…Canadians seem to be discriminated against in majority of what is on the market for consumers while the Americans get it all. I agree, it is most annoying to say the least when such articles are posted that are not available to us!
  3. Avatar
    • Anonymous
    • January 1, 1970
    Reply
    I guess everyone has different taste but when my bf and I saw the commercial for pajama jeans, we laughed our heads off! It’s soooo ugly and the concept is so bad that we thought maybe the commercial was a joke. I just can’t believe that you created a post to promote this but trash the uggs and lulu pants in your other article – Worst Trends of 2000s. Yes you and many others may think uggs are ugly and that’s fine but you think pajama jeans is not?!??!???!!!?
  4. Avatar
    • Anonymous
    • January 1, 1970
    Reply
    It appears you can only get these in the U.S. Why do an article on an item that is not even available to Canadians!! What’s the point? Very annoying!
  5. Avatar
    • Anonymous
    • January 1, 1970
    Reply
    And where would one find these pajama jeans?
  6. Avatar
    • Anonymous
    • January 1, 1970
    Reply
    there ugly…
  7. Avatar
    • Anonymous
    • January 1, 1970
    Reply
    isn’t this usually the way…Canadians seem to be discriminated against in majority of what is on the market for consumers while the Americans get it all. I agree, it is most annoying to say the least when such articles are posted that are not available to us!
  8. Avatar
    • Anonymous
    • January 1, 1970
    Reply
    I guess everyone has different taste but when my bf and I saw the commercial for pajama jeans, we laughed our heads off! It’s soooo ugly and the concept is so bad that we thought maybe the commercial was a joke. I just can’t believe that you created a post to promote this but trash the uggs and lulu pants in your other article – Worst Trends of 2000s. Yes you and many others may think uggs are ugly and that’s fine but you think pajama jeans is not?!??!???!!!?
  9. Avatar
    • Anonymous
    • January 1, 1970
    Reply
    It appears you can only get these in the U.S. Why do an article on an item that is not even available to Canadians!! What’s the point? Very annoying!
  10. Avatar
    • Anonymous
    • January 1, 1970
    Reply
    And where would one find these pajama jeans?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×